- Using Guzi’s essay (perhaps Part I for the most part), how would you present your own definition of a soundscape. Try to distinguish it from a sound. Distinguish it from a landscape. The point is NOT to present Guzi’s definition, Wikipedia’s, or mine. Make it your own!!
I liked her idea that organisms have their own sound frequencies or bands to communicate with. Sticking with that I’d say a soundscape is an ecosystem of sound. In any given space or soundscape the sounds there can work in harmony or work against each other and become chaotic or too much. It all depends on the type of sound in the space or even the type of space. A quiet study room may have a more harmonious soundscape, light keyboard tapping, the hum of the ventilation or people breathing with far off conversations drowning into noise you can’t quite understand. Whereas the dining hall may have more of a chaotic sound to it, a speaker playing loud music behind the counter, people laughing and talking over one another, pots and pans banging in the kitchen. These two ecosystems of sound are very different because these spaces are very different. I’ll definitely try to pay a bit more attention to each room’s soundscape now that I’ve been introduced to this idea.
- What are two sonic elements that stand out from the soundscape you chose to listen to as you read Guzi’s essay? Why do you think they stood out?
I listened to the soundscape of the kitchen and I thought it went in an interesting direction. I thought they would be a bit more similar as food preparation is something that has connected us throughout the centuries. I honestly didn’t like the modern section as there was so little personal movement in it. It didn’t feel very alive unlike the historic one. I still think of kitchens as a very lively place, at least they are in my house, where people come to congregate and make food together. I thought it was going to be interesting to hear how the background noise may have changed a bit, the hum of a refrigerator instead of the stirring of coals, but that there would still be that unmistakable sign of people there as well. But I didn’t get that which I thought was an interesting choice to go with creatively. I wonder if it’s supposed to be a commentary on how people are being disconnected as time goes on. Though now I may just be reading a bit too far into it. So it was more of the lack of sound that stood out to me there. But I also really liked how the fire stoking sounded in the historic soundscape. I have a fireplace at home and I thought it was captured very well and I knew almost immediately what it was supposed to be. It’s a sound that reminds me of home so it made the historic version feel more home like to me. Though that may be my own bias.